Compare

Compare companies

Pick two to four companies and follow where each one ranked on ten years of fundamentals, at every archive anchor, as a share of every company we could rank at the time. Higher is better. The share matters rather than the place because the number of ranked companies grows over time, so the same place means something different at either end.

  • AAPL - Apple Inc logoAAPL×
  • MSFT - Microsoft Corporation logoMSFT×
  • INTC - Intel Corporation logoINTC×
  • IBM - International Business Machines logoIBM×
  • Four companies selected. Remove one to add another.

The share of observed periods in which revenue increased.

Fundamentals Window

This is not a date range. It selects the ranking built on five, ten, or twenty years of published fundamentals.

Market position over time

Revenue Trend, ranked on ten years of fundamentals at each anchor. A gap is a year the company was not ranked, not a zero.

  • AAPL
  • MSFT
  • INTC
  • IBM
Revenue Trend: market position of each company at every ranking anchor, as a share of the companies ranked that year. Lower share is a better position.
YearApple Inc (AAPL)Microsoft Corporation (MSFT)Intel Corporation (INTC)International Business Machines (IBM)
1996Top 23% (#47 of 206)not rankedTop 28% (#57 of 206)Top 87% (#180 of 206)
1997Top 41% (#107 of 264)Top 13% (#34 of 264)Top 15% (#39 of 264)Top 89% (#234 of 264)
1998Top 59% (#211 of 356)Top 14% (#50 of 356)Top 7.6% (#27 of 356)Top 87% (#309 of 356)
1999Top 74% (#297 of 400)Top 12% (#48 of 400)Top 11% (#45 of 400)Top 89% (#355 of 400)
2000Top 68% (#294 of 433)Top 6.5% (#28 of 433)Top 1.2% (#5 of 433)Top 87% (#377 of 433)
2001Top 70% (#400 of 570)Top 8.8% (#50 of 570)Top 16% (#89 of 570)Top 88% (#502 of 570)
2002Top 81% (#504 of 620)Top 5.3% (#33 of 620)Top 18% (#111 of 620)Top 89% (#552 of 620)
2003Top 81% (#596 of 732)Top 15% (#112 of 732)Top 19% (#137 of 732)Top 84% (#613 of 732)
2004Top 86% (#715 of 829)Top 2.2% (#18 of 829)Top 20% (#166 of 829)Top 71% (#590 of 829)
2005Top 76% (#695 of 912)Top 6.9% (#63 of 912)Top 29% (#263 of 912)Top 50% (#459 of 912)
2006Top 86% (#866 of 1006)Top 0.20% (#2 of 1006)Top 18% (#177 of 1006)Top 68% (#681 of 1006)
2007Top 61% (#680 of 1119)Top 1.1% (#12 of 1119)Top 41% (#464 of 1119)Top 73% (#812 of 1119)
2008Top 44% (#532 of 1209)Top 9.9% (#120 of 1209)Top 41% (#495 of 1209)Top 64% (#777 of 1209)
2009Top 15% (#200 of 1301)Top 2.5% (#33 of 1301)Top 59% (#768 of 1301)Top 67% (#877 of 1301)
2010Top 15% (#210 of 1406)Top 15% (#214 of 1406)Top 80% (#1121 of 1406)Top 78% (#1092 of 1406)
2011Top 15% (#220 of 1488)Top 15% (#216 of 1488)Top 77% (#1144 of 1488)Top 75% (#1123 of 1488)
2012Top 8.5% (#132 of 1548)Top 10% (#156 of 1548)Top 51% (#796 of 1548)Top 46% (#708 of 1548)
2013Top 6.1% (#97 of 1598)Top 9.4% (#150 of 1598)Top 78% (#1247 of 1598)Top 54% (#855 of 1598)
2014Top 7.7% (#126 of 1645)Top 24% (#396 of 1645)Top 84% (#1387 of 1645)Top 65% (#1068 of 1645)
2015Top 4.9% (#83 of 1710)Top 14% (#245 of 1710)Top 88% (#1499 of 1710)Top 85% (#1452 of 1710)
2016Top 3.2% (#58 of 1786)Top 12% (#215 of 1786)Top 88% (#1580 of 1786)Top 82% (#1472 of 1786)
2017Top 15% (#275 of 1862)Top 28% (#518 of 1862)Top 84% (#1559 of 1862)Top 88% (#1643 of 1862)
2018Top 14% (#266 of 1953)Top 26% (#508 of 1953)Top 79% (#1551 of 1953)Top 97% (#1897 of 1953)
2019Top 12% (#248 of 2016)Top 29% (#594 of 2016)Top 61% (#1230 of 2016)Top 97% (#1950 of 2016)
2020Top 34% (#708 of 2058)Top 13% (#271 of 2058)Top 54% (#1115 of 2058)Top 96% (#1975 of 2058)
2021Top 36% (#758 of 2133)Top 9.7% (#206 of 2133)Top 50% (#1059 of 2133)Top 95% (#2031 of 2133)

Revenue Trend, ten years of fundamentals

Every measure, read at 2021

One anchor for the whole grid, so the columns are comparable. Pick a measure to follow it year by year.

Market position of each selected company on every fundamental measure at the 2021 anchor
MeasureAAPLMSFTINTCIBM
HDB ScoreBest rank among compared companies: Top 8.9%Top 22%Top 37%Top 40%
Net Income GrowthBest rank among compared companies: Top 18%Top 34%Top 45%Top 70%
Net Income ConsistencyBest rank among compared companies: Top 14%Top 40%Top 30%Top 15%
Net Income TrendBest rank among compared companies: Top 15%Top 26%Top 94%Top 72%
Net Income SumBest rank among compared companies: Top 0.05%Top 0.23%Top 0.50%Top 0.83%
Revenue GrowthBest rank among compared companies: Top 12%Top 28%Top 40%Top 85%
Revenue ConsistencyTop 29%Best rank among compared companies: Top 12%Top 25%Top 37%
Revenue TrendTop 36%Best rank among compared companies: Top 9.7%Top 50%Top 95%
Revenue SumBest rank among compared companies: Top 0.37%Top 1.3%Top 2.4%Top 1.6%

Membership

This comparison is public through 2021. The rankings continue.

2022 · 2023 · 2024 · 2025

Continue these histories