Compare

Compare companies

Pick two to four companies and follow where each one ranked on ten years of fundamentals, at every archive anchor, as a share of every company we could rank at the time. Higher is better. The share matters rather than the place because the number of ranked companies grows over time, so the same place means something different at either end.

  • COST - Costco Wholesale Corp logoCOST×
  • WMT - Walmart Inc. logoWMT×
  • HD - The Home Depot Inc logoHD×
  • LOW - Lowe's Companies Inc logoLOW×
  • Four companies selected. Remove one to add another.

A composite view of the available fundamental measures for this window.

Fundamentals Window

This is not a date range. It selects the ranking built on five, ten, or twenty years of published fundamentals.

Market position over time

HDB Score, ranked on ten years of fundamentals at each anchor. A gap is a year the company was not ranked, not a zero.

  • COST
  • WMT
  • HD
  • LOW
HDB Score: market position of each company at every ranking anchor, as a share of the companies ranked that year. Lower share is a better position.
YearCostco Wholesale Corp (COST)Walmart Inc. (WMT)The Home Depot Inc (HD)Lowe's Companies Inc (LOW)
1996not rankedTop 1.0% (#2 of 193)Top 0.52% (#1 of 193)Top 34% (#66 of 193)
1997not rankedTop 1.2% (#3 of 250)Top 0.80% (#2 of 250)Top 27% (#67 of 250)
1998not rankedTop 0.90% (#3 of 333)Top 0.60% (#2 of 333)Top 22% (#73 of 333)
1999not rankedTop 1.3% (#5 of 371)Top 0.54% (#2 of 371)Top 16% (#60 of 371)
2000not rankedTop 0.96% (#4 of 418)Top 0.48% (#2 of 418)Top 12% (#49 of 418)
2001not rankedTop 1.6% (#9 of 558)Top 0.72% (#4 of 558)Top 6.5% (#36 of 558)
2002not rankedTop 2.1% (#13 of 611)Top 0.49% (#3 of 611)Top 0.33% (#2 of 611)
2003not rankedTop 1.7% (#12 of 727)Top 0.55% (#4 of 727)Top 0.28% (#2 of 727)
2004not rankedTop 1.5% (#12 of 818)Top 0.61% (#5 of 818)Top 0.37% (#3 of 818)
2005Top 6.3% (#57 of 901)Top 2.4% (#22 of 901)Top 0.67% (#6 of 901)Top 0.44% (#4 of 901)
2006Top 6.3% (#62 of 989)Top 2.7% (#27 of 989)Top 0.71% (#7 of 989)Top 0.30% (#3 of 989)
2007Top 7.6% (#84 of 1104)Top 2.5% (#28 of 1104)Top 3.3% (#36 of 1104)Top 0.18% (#2 of 1104)
2008Top 13% (#152 of 1193)Top 1.3% (#15 of 1193)Top 14% (#172 of 1193)Top 1.0% (#12 of 1193)
2009Top 9.7% (#124 of 1281)Top 0.86% (#11 of 1281)Top 48% (#610 of 1281)Top 6.6% (#85 of 1281)
2010Top 9.2% (#127 of 1375)Top 0.95% (#13 of 1375)Top 54% (#740 of 1375)Top 20% (#275 of 1375)
2011Top 12% (#176 of 1464)Top 1.6% (#23 of 1464)Top 59% (#862 of 1464)Top 30% (#435 of 1464)
2012Top 10% (#158 of 1527)Top 4.6% (#71 of 1527)Top 64% (#981 of 1527)Top 52% (#794 of 1527)
2013Top 9.5% (#149 of 1570)Top 5.5% (#87 of 1570)Top 66% (#1030 of 1570)Top 51% (#795 of 1570)
2014Top 7.6% (#123 of 1608)Top 9.2% (#148 of 1608)Top 68% (#1095 of 1608)Top 40% (#640 of 1608)
2015Top 7.5% (#125 of 1675)Top 9.8% (#164 of 1675)Top 66% (#1111 of 1675)Top 40% (#669 of 1675)
2016Top 5.3% (#93 of 1753)Top 18% (#314 of 1753)Top 46% (#806 of 1753)Top 53% (#927 of 1753)
2017Top 6.9% (#126 of 1816)Top 34% (#617 of 1816)Top 18% (#322 of 1816)Top 43% (#782 of 1816)
2018Top 4.8% (#90 of 1891)Top 44% (#834 of 1891)Top 5.4% (#103 of 1891)Top 22% (#417 of 1891)
2019Top 5.6% (#109 of 1959)Top 43% (#844 of 1959)Top 0.71% (#14 of 1959)Top 27% (#530 of 1959)
2020Top 2.5% (#50 of 1986)Top 47% (#939 of 1986)Top 0.70% (#14 of 1986)Top 19% (#370 of 1986)
2021Top 1.3% (#26 of 2060)Top 46% (#950 of 2060)Top 0.24% (#5 of 2060)Top 9.8% (#201 of 2060)

HDB Score, ten years of fundamentals

Every measure, read at 2021

One anchor for the whole grid, so the columns are comparable. Pick a measure to follow it year by year.

Market position of each selected company on every fundamental measure at the 2021 anchor
MeasureCOSTWMTHDLOW
HDB ScoreTop 1.3%Top 46%Best rank among compared companies: Top 0.24%Top 9.8%
Net Income GrowthTop 26%Top 64%Best rank among compared companies: Top 19%Top 28%
Net Income ConsistencyTop 0.87%Top 41%Best rank among compared companies: Top 0.18%Top 14%
Net Income TrendTop 1.6%Top 94%Best rank among compared companies: Top 0.80%Top 20%
Net Income SumTop 5.9%Best rank among compared companies: Top 0.55%Top 1.5%Top 5.1%
Revenue GrowthBest rank among compared companies: Top 30%Top 58%Top 35%Top 38%
Revenue ConsistencyBest rank among compared companies: Top 3.9%Top 20%Top 4.5%Top 12%
Revenue TrendTop 8.7%Top 20%Top 7.1%Best rank among compared companies: Top 6.7%
Revenue SumTop 0.92%Best rank among compared companies: Top 0.05%Top 1.4%Top 2.4%

Membership

This comparison is public through 2021. The rankings continue.

2022 · 2023 · 2024 · 2025

Continue these histories