Compare

Compare companies

Pick two to four companies and follow where each one ranked on five years of fundamentals, at every archive anchor, as a share of every company we could rank at the time. Higher is better. The share matters rather than the place because the number of ranked companies grows over time, so the same place means something different at either end.

A composite view of the available fundamental measures for this window.

Fundamentals Window

This is not a date range. It selects the ranking built on five, ten, or twenty years of published fundamentals.

Market position over time

HDB Score, ranked on five years of fundamentals at each anchor. A gap is a year the company was not ranked, not a zero.

  • AAPL
  • MSFT
  • INTC
  • IBM
HDB Score: market position of each company at every ranking anchor, as a share of the companies ranked that year. Lower share is a better position.
YearApple Inc (AAPL)Microsoft Corporation (MSFT)Intel Corporation (INTC)International Business Machines (IBM)
1996Top 51% (#283 of 554)Top 0.54% (#3 of 554)Top 5.4% (#30 of 554)Top 97% (#536 of 554)
1997Top 76% (#465 of 613)Top 1.6% (#10 of 613)Top 6.2% (#38 of 613)Top 65% (#398 of 613)
1998Top 96% (#698 of 728)Top 1.2% (#9 of 728)Top 6.2% (#45 of 728)Top 44% (#323 of 728)
1999Top 74% (#607 of 819)Top 0.73% (#6 of 819)Top 33% (#269 of 819)Top 18% (#148 of 819)
2000Top 80% (#723 of 899)Top 0.44% (#4 of 899)Top 12% (#108 of 899)Top 11% (#95 of 899)
2001Top 79% (#786 of 992)Top 0.50% (#5 of 992)Top 14% (#143 of 992)Top 16% (#160 of 992)
2002Top 60% (#667 of 1107)Top 6.4% (#71 of 1107)Top 58% (#640 of 1107)Top 33% (#361 of 1107)
2003Top 32% (#378 of 1195)Top 9.0% (#107 of 1195)Top 51% (#612 of 1195)Top 57% (#681 of 1195)
2004Top 49% (#631 of 1283)Top 27% (#341 of 1283)Top 39% (#494 of 1283)Top 56% (#722 of 1283)
2005Top 50% (#693 of 1381)Top 41% (#565 of 1381)Top 41% (#569 of 1381)Top 63% (#875 of 1381)
2006Top 29% (#422 of 1466)Top 41% (#594 of 1466)Top 46% (#681 of 1466)Top 73% (#1072 of 1466)
2007Top 0.20% (#3 of 1524)Top 29% (#449 of 1524)Top 22% (#333 of 1524)Top 59% (#897 of 1524)
2008Top 0.06% (#1 of 1568)Top 30% (#470 of 1568)Top 36% (#570 of 1568)Top 19% (#294 of 1568)
2009Top 0.06% (#1 of 1610)Top 5.0% (#81 of 1610)Top 58% (#939 of 1610)Top 18% (#283 of 1610)
2010Top 0.06% (#1 of 1664)Top 13% (#208 of 1664)Top 73% (#1213 of 1664)Top 13% (#212 of 1664)
2011Top 0.06% (#1 of 1744)Top 14% (#243 of 1744)Top 64% (#1122 of 1744)Top 6.8% (#118 of 1744)
2012Top 0.06% (#1 of 1811)Top 10% (#185 of 1811)Top 23% (#420 of 1811)Top 6.9% (#125 of 1811)
2013Top 0.05% (#1 of 1896)Top 28% (#540 of 1896)Top 53% (#999 of 1896)Top 12% (#219 of 1896)
2014Top 1.9% (#38 of 1955)Top 38% (#742 of 1955)Top 59% (#1158 of 1955)Top 42% (#816 of 1955)
2015Top 3.5% (#69 of 1995)Top 21% (#426 of 1995)Top 34% (#684 of 1995)Top 70% (#1392 of 1995)
2016Top 3.0% (#61 of 2067)Top 39% (#810 of 2067)Top 68% (#1409 of 2067)Top 68% (#1413 of 2067)
2017Top 24% (#515 of 2110)Top 41% (#865 of 2110)Top 81% (#1715 of 2110)Top 84% (#1775 of 2110)
2018Top 37% (#818 of 2207)Top 20% (#435 of 2207)Top 76% (#1675 of 2207)Top 95% (#2092 of 2207)
2019Top 20% (#451 of 2305)Top 45% (#1044 of 2305)Top 41% (#941 of 2305)Top 85% (#1961 of 2305)
2020Top 40% (#984 of 2432)Top 28% (#686 of 2432)Top 57% (#1390 of 2432)Top 71% (#1724 of 2432)
2021Top 43% (#1087 of 2526)Top 6.6% (#166 of 2526)Top 45% (#1135 of 2526)Top 72% (#1807 of 2526)

HDB Score, five years of fundamentals

Every measure, read at no shared anchor

One anchor for the whole grid, so the columns are comparable. Pick a measure to follow it year by year.

These measures share no anchor we can read for this period, so there is no honest grid to show.

Membership

This comparison is public through 2021. The rankings continue.

2022 · 2023 · 2024 · 2025

Continue these histories